$In July 2018, he signed a four-year contract with Falcons in the amount of 10.9 million USD.
Look at the possibilities of the red zone within the lines of 20, 10 and 5 yards, as well as the percentage of time when they turned the opportunity into a touch.
How does Calvin Ridley’s advanced statistics for 2020 compare to other broad receivers?
This section compares his advanced statistics with players in the same position. The line represents the percentile rank of the player. The longer the bar, the better for the player.
Pros. Depth of target
14.6 Yds
2020 NFL Game Log
See where Calvin Ridley lined up on the field and how he performed in each place.
Overview of measurable products
See the College Player page
How do Calvin Ridley’s measurable values ​​compare to other wide receivers?
This section compares his draft training metrics with players in the same position. The line represents the percentile rank of the player. For example, if the bar is halfway, the player falls into the 50th percentile for that metric and that would be considered average.
The 26th draft in the 2018 draft, Ridley continued last season where he stood as a rookie, only with more efficiency, before missing the last three seasons of the season with a stomach injury. He ran his YPC and YPT marks at 13.7 and 9.3, respectively, and scored seven times, even though he only saw seven red zone targets throughout the year. Ridley didn’t play many big plays – only 12 catches of 20 yards and none for more than 40 – but he also showed improved focus (just three drops) and put in better numbers after Mohamed Sanu was substituted and Austin Hooper injured. At 6-1, 190, Ridley has only average size, and his speed of 4.43 40 is above average, but nothing special for a player of his frame. Ridley is also a good route runner, capable of being placed in or out of a slot. With Hooper now in Cleveland, Ridley is a clear No. 2 option after 31-year-old Juli Jones, playing in a system suitable for passing with capable Matt Ryan at fullback. Healthy Jones limits Ridley’s ceiling, but the addition wood is narrow and gives it a strong floor.
Recorded with 26th overall pick last year, Ridley had a promising beginner season with 10 results (T-6), 8.9 YPT and four 40-yard catches on just 92 targets. Usually that kind of debut would hint at big things in Year 2. But six Ridley TDs came in weeks 2-4 – he only had four results from week 5 to the end of the year. Moreover, Ridley’s focus was sometimes questionable as he dropped nine passes, nearly 10 percent of the overall look. Finally, the once-challenged Julio Jones challenged by the red zone in the second half cracked a TD-goal, and Jones goes nowhere as the team’s target pig and first glance close to the goal line. With 6-1, 190, Ridley has average size and good speed (4.43 40). It’s a sleek route runner and versatile enough to line up outside or in a slot. And while Jones ’presence limits the target and production ceiling, there’s a nice floor with a stable QB situation, TE’s modest contributions in the passing game and only 30-year-old Mohamed Sanu competing for the non-Jones portion of the show opportunity.
Taken with the 26th overall pick, Ridley is in an almost ideal landing spot. The Falcons have top-notch QB in their prime and a void in creating performances as opposed to the aged Julio Jones at the receiver. Mohamed Sanu is a decent option for possession, but it’s slow and has only had one catch of 40 yards in the last two years. Enter Ridley, a sleek route runner and an excellent receiver in college who runs 4.43 40 and has enough speed to put himself in a slot. With 6-1, 190, Ridley isn’t particularly stout, and he’s already 23, so his ceiling may not be as high as some of the younger players in his class. But he should see targets at the door and has a good chance of being the team’s second option soon.
0 Comments